WHY AMERICA WANTS TO LOSE AF-PAK, SYRIA, IRAQ, LIBYA

Dear Earthlings,


Sometimes, you get more out of losing than winning.  You must have heard about match fixing and how players earn millions by throwing away matches as per previously arranged deals with punters.  You may be surprised to know that America's longest war in Afghanistan is one of those fixed games.  Now, by privatizing the Afghan war through Erik Prince and Blackwater, the American administration would only be formalizing an earlier arrangement which saw over 50,000 private contractors handling many subordinate tasks.


Why would America be so keen to hold elections in Syria?  What role do elections have to play in counter jihad strategy?  If elections in Egypt were to be taken as an example, then the victory of the Muslim brotherhood and the subsequent American acquiescence of the coup by Sisi should have been ample proof that elections will only favor the Islamists.  But does America really care?  Regime change and democratic packaging have only been the cover for selling these millitary-industrial-complex schemes to the American public especially the women.


Elections in Turkey, Maldives, Bangladesh, Pakistan and even Tunisia have only legitimized Islamic states where democracy is only a camouflage for defending Islamization.  All that the Americans really hope to achieve is to install puppet regimes, like in Afghanistan, who will be favorable to America's economic and military interests.  Such a blatant deception in the name of the masses can only benefit the jihadis in the long run.


If the American public really wants to defeat terror, then they will have to ask some tough questions.  Will economic development defeat terror in Afghanistan?  Will democracy defeat terror?  Will high tech weapons defeat this inveterate enemy of mankind?  Why is the enemy so resilient?  The answer will pop up.  The jihadi is headstrong.  We on the other hand are weak in conviction, liberal/slack in our outlook.  We do not bat an eyelid when our journalists lie to us that it is poverty that causes jihad.


We are losing the battle in our minds.  There is a psychological asymmetry in favor of the jihadi.  We are told by our leaders to focus on jobs and career, but their clerics tell them to put Islam first.  They tell them that Islam will conquer the world.  They say that Islam is pristine.  They say that jihadis will be in heaven.  Our elected leaders deceive us while their clerics deceive the Islamic kids.


The organic antijihad approach requires us to arm the people with the facts so that they can prepare themselves psychologically to face the enemy both at home and abroad.  SHARIA IS THE PATH OF TERROR.  There is no mild, moderate or extremist Muslim.  Hamza bin Laden is on the trajectory of terror as long as he does not repudiate sharia.  He may not have killed anybody, but he is still a terrorist, because he espouses the values of a jihadi, i.e. sharia.


Anjem Chaudary's wife may not have killed anybody, but she shares the values of any terrorist, but liberals seem to be too confused to draw any line of demarcation.  Anybody who believes preaches or practices sharia is a terrorist.  The difference is only in gradation.


So any authentic antijihad approach requires us to focus on:

1.  Preventing the camouflaging of jihadi values like Islamic financing, halal food, burkha as religious practices.  This is soft jihad to prepare the mind for jihad.  Using the name of Allah, it drives a wedge between Muslims and nonMuslims which only grows with time.
2.  Mosques-madrasa complex.  These are the jihadi production centers/factories where such prejudices are inculcated in small children and reinforced by stupid liberal tolerance and human rights fallacies.
3.  Jihadi slaves.  These include the weaker sections of society, the women and children, who may appear benign but act as passive (deaf, blind, and dumb) vehicles of transmission of jihadi values to the next generation.

Trump and Obama both wanted to end foreign intervention but have been prevailed upon by the Deep State to continue these lucrative interventions.  The killer swamp has claimed a few more high profile victims.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing this post and donating.  Do your bit.

ANJEM CHOUDARY, PROTECTed

Dear Earthlings,


Anjem Choudary has been released from prison after just serving half of his 5-1/2 year sentence and he is supposed to be the most rabid hate preacher in England.  Can you believe this?  This could not have happened without some connivance on the part of the British authorities.  The fact is the British govt likes to infiltrate terrorist groups with its agents and Choudary could have been part of that recruiting network.


Gullible Britishers have been taken for a ride by their elected government.  They should now be asking their treacherous leaders a few tough questions.

1.   In what way has his imprisonment changed him for the better?
2.   What were the steps taken by the govt to deradicalise him?
3.   Why is he being released so early?  Not for good behavior, regular namaz, wudu, etc. I presume.
4.   How many more terrorists were deradicalised by the govt?
5.   Why is there so much secrecy around this?  Will not these deradicalised terrorists be the most effective advt. for the success of the CONTEST program?
6.   If he is a deradicalisation success story, then why are 2 million pounds being spent on his protection?

The plain fact is that most common Britishers, including journalists do not know how to deal with this pest.  They are constrained by the highfalutin principles that the EU and their human rights armies propagate globally.  His wife has been holding fort while he has been in prison without so much as a sweat.


The English govt lacks the organic weapons needed to deal with such enemies of Homo sapiens.  Death penalty is the apt approach to get rid of these vermin.  However freedom of speech objects to it saying that it is barbaric and is not a deterrent claiming to invoke study after study to prove her case.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  The deterrence effect of the death penalty for apostasy in Islam itself proves that most Muslims are deterred by the death penalty.


All the political parties on the right and the left keep the ordinary people distracted by blaming each other for the problem, but the fact is they have all deliberately misinformed their own people about the nature of the problem for purely economic gain.  SHARIA IS THE BLUEPRINT OF ISLAMIC TERROR.  In the name of freedom of religion, sharia has been given a free hand.


Obama, like his predecessors, certified that Islam is a great religion.  This is how the international establishment co-opts those who are the icons of change.  Instead of giving lectures on human rights to Myanmar, the British govt which has occupied a permanent seat in the UNSC should try to justify it by taking the lead in formulating a GLOBAL SHARIA BAN TREATY.  Austria, Hungary, and Poland will be the first to support such a treaty.  It should stop secret surveillance of Muslims and do it openly.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing, and donating.  Do your bit.

MeToo SLAVE OF SHARIA, BHARAT MATA

Dear Earthlings,


I, Bharat mata, have undergone the most horrible torture at the hands of these jihadis who have invaded me in rapid succession for more than a thousand years.  They have inflicted such ugly wounds on my children and daughters and have scarred my soul almost beyond redemption.  I am now in the final throes of a life and death battle with these demonic forces of Islam to save myself.


Women in India were respected as goddesses.  The jihadi has degraded and humiliated the Indian women to no end.  No other monster has disfigured my daughters to such an extent.  Many of my daughters are so traumatized that they cannot see that the burkha is an oppressive garment.


Yet, my modern daughters have not yet seen it fit to ban the burkha in India.  They are trapped in weird women's rights campaigns centered around invading dargahs and masjids.  If my daughters would only listen to their mother's advice, I would request them to stay far away from these garbage dumps.


Homo jihadifitus still nurses a deep desire to convert this land into his harem.  I will resist all attempts of Homo jihadifitus to shroud me in that ugly black coffin known as a burkha.  I look good only in a sari, not a burkha.  Any creature that harbours such evil intentions has no right to call himself Homo sapiens let alone an Indian.


What the Englishman thinks is of no consequence.  Those who want to live by sharia law should be stripped of their Indian citizenship.  They are jihadi ki aulad and do not deserve anymore dignity.  Enough of this appeasement.  It is time to kick this people out of this planet.  This is Judgment of Homo Sapiens and this is the Judgment Day.  We do not need any Allah to pass judgment on these abominable specimens.  We judge them by their thoughts, words, and deeds.


I am requesting you to seriously consider the following points.

1.   Burkha must be banned.
2.   No person who practises or believes in sharia or who forces his wife to wear burkha should        be eligible for getting elected or voting.
3.   No person who practises or believes in sharia should be eligible for Indian citizenship.

REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, and tweeting.   Do your bit.

MeToo SLAVE OF SHARIA LONDON GIRL

Dear Earthlings,


I was a young girl in my early teens, when I became friends with a Muslim of Pakistani origin.  Our relationship grew deeper and I soon started hanging out with his other friends.  I liked the nightlife and the drugs and the alcohol.  One night, after a drinking session, I passed out and when I came to, I found out that I had been s**ually assaulted.


I tried to stay away from them, but I soon discovered that I had become addicted to the drugs and alcohol.  I was then pushed by these men into a prostitution racket.  These men told me that since I was not a Muslim, they could use me as a s** slave.  While Muslim women were not freely available, they could fulfill their desires with me.  Islamic law did not forbid this kind of a relationship with nonMuslim females.  We were like possessions of the right hand, in sharia parlance, for them.


Over the years, I had frequent health checkup at many s**ual health clinics.  None of them raised a red flag over my excessive demand for contraceptives.  I even had a couple of abortions but no one bothered to investigate.  We were after all a liberated society and this was all my personal matter.


Soon I realized through media that I was just one of the thousands of young girls who had been systematically exploited by Muslim gangs throughout England.  I realized how the authorities had turned a blind eye to this phenomenon out of a fear of fanning Islamophobia.  They even got Sarah Champion to resign from the shadow cabinet for identifying the problem as Islamic.


Tommy Robinson who was the first to give this issue its full importance was derided as a fascist and is now cooling his heels in jail.  Is this how England pays those who defend her freedoms, her little children?  How far will we fall in political correctness?


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating and tweeting.  Do your bit.

MeToo SLAVE OF SHARIA A****

Dear Earthlings,


I, A****, was married to my husband, who claimed to be a godman, at the tender age of 9.  My father was his die hard follower.  When his first wife died and he proposed to marry me, my father was elated beyond words.  I was too small at that time, but now I think why did my husband seek to protect himself from his opponents by a marriage alliance with me?  Was his God not capable of protecting him?  To this day, this event has cast a shadow over the fate of millions of young Muslim girls whose marriages are justified giving me as an example.


I was barely 13, when I was accused of adultery.  My husband seemed to suspect me.  I was inconsolable.  Luckily, I got away, but the ruling of four adult male witnesses to prove r*** that was revealed in this context has sealed the fate of Muslim women who can rarely hope for justice under this law.  Is this divine justice?  Could this really be God's law?


As I grew older, doubts had begun to creep in my mind, regarding my husband's relationship with God?  God seemed to indulge my husband when it came to women.  He claimed that God exempted him from the limitation of 4 women and he could marry as many as he pleased.  I wondered why God could not have been so kind when he was with his first wife.  When I questioned him about this, God egged him on to divorce me if I did not behave.


My doubts grew even larger when my husband died all of a sudden without even nominating an heir.  How were we to elect a successor?  How could God leave us in the lurch like that?  Even a mere mortal king knows that he has to plan for succession.  How could God not anticipate my husband's death?  Luckily my father retrieved the situation with some deft maneuvering and things seemed to settle down for a while.


But not for long.  Every Tom, Dick, and Harry wanted to be the caliph of Islam.  All the holy platitudes were forgotten as they leapt for each other's throat.  Where was the religion I thought?  This was nothing but a sham after all.  We all had been taken for a ride.  When Ali became the Caliph, I had enough of God's justice.  This was the man who had sided against me in the adultery case.  I would not let him get away with this achievement.  I instigated everybody against him and marched against him with a huge army, but alas it was not to be.  I wonder how would Islam have been today, if I had won that most important battle of my life.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, and tweeting.  Do your bit.

MeToo SLAVE OF SHARIA RAYHANA BINT ZAYD

Dear Earthlings,


I, Rayhana, travel back in time with you for more than a milennium to that fateful day when my world came crashing down on me.  Our small fortress on the outskirts of Medina had been surrounded on all sides by Islamic brigands who were baying for our blood.  They accused us of stabbing them in the back by siding with our enemy.


Ever since the fall of Banu Nadir and Banu Qaynuqa, we had been dreading this day.  The enemy was unscrupulous to the core.  Which treaty?  We had not signed any treaty with these rogues.  Anyone who did not accept Islam was fair game for them.  In fact, they had refused any help from nonMuslims during the battle of Uhud.  Their only agenda was to get rid of all who opposed their madness.  They wanted our wealth, our weapons and most importantly our women.


We held on for 25 days, but the siege would not relent.  Then we decided to surrender and make a last frantic appeal for mercy.  But Allah and his angel Gabriel are never merciful to nonMuslims.  More than 900 of our brave men were beheaded in cold blood and their bodies disposed of unceremoniously in a huge trench.


With teary eyes, I watched as our children and women were packed off to Najd to be sold as slaves to buy weapons and money for jihad.  No, no, no you liberal traitors, this was no spiritual jihad.  How dare you peddle such shameful lies?  Do you have any principles left?


Their boss offered me his hand in marriage, but for that I would have to convert to Islam.  I would rather let my body be defiled than tarnish my soul by accepting this grotesque prejudice as a religion.


And now you think that women are going to enter the mosques and hijack Islam for you.  Your petty minds know no bounds.  You fantasize that you are going to liberate Muslim women by reforming Islam.  Your avarice gets the better of you.  An 18 trillion dollar economy and still counting.  No amount of funding can end sexual violence unless you identify the cause of the violence.  SHARIA RANKS AS THE NUMBER ONE CAUSE OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE FOR MORE THAN A MILLENIUM.  If you really care, then ban the preaching of the divinity and perfection of sharia to small unsuspecting Muslim kids.  Sharia is a potent neurotoxin.  It cannot be a human right.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating and tweeting.

MeToo DURGAVATI AND AKBAR

Dear Earthlings,


I, Durgavati, watch with great interest as salacious tidbits of M.J. Akbar's harem leak out into the Delhi smog.  He was considered as one of the most liberal and secular Muslims of India.  He was the second incarnation of Akbar the Great himself.  Did his mother not teach him to respect the feminine gender? Do men disrespect women because patriarchy teaches men to exploit women?  The feminists say that the upbringing of men is faulty.


Is this the way to solve women's problems?  Do problems get solved by voyeuristic and sensationalist debates on prime time?  A fake solution does not solve problems.  Did Sajid Khan, Karim Morani, Madhur Bhandarkar, and Vikas Bahl's mothers teach them to exploit women?  Why did the likes of Saba Naqvi, Harinder Baweja, Ghazala Wahab who claim to fight for women's empowerment keep mum all these years?  If they are as strong as they pretend to be, could not they have ganged up then like they do now to bring down the offender?


Why do the likes of Shahrukh Khan, Mr. Bacchhan, Amir Khan etc still stay more or less mum about these issues?  Did they not know about this already?  The answer is not only the women but the men also fear loss of job opportunities, status, wealth, fame if they take on these wolves of the establishment.  It is not patriarchy that is to blame, but the system itself that works with one motive and that is wealth creation.


There is very little place for anything else in this system.  It is the justice system that fails both the men and the women.  It requires these fake feminists to hide its ugly reality and promote a fake model of empowerment.  Mr. M.J. Akbar was one of those fake secular liberal icons and the garv-se-kaho Hindutvavadis are finding it a bit embarassing to show him the door.  He is one of the few Muslim faces of the party.  Sushma Swaraj's silence on the issue speaks a lot about women's empowerment.


The feminists say that it does not matter if the case is decades old, then I would like to put them to the test.  Let them reopen the case of the original Akbar the Great, the great secular Muslim of Indian history.  Is he too big to fall too?  His appetite for women would have put Casanova to shame.  He was such a debauch that he is known to have killed some of his own confidantes to induct their wives into his harem.  How long will this man continue to be hailed as The Great?


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, and tweeting.