Pages

Friday 12 February 2021

THE FRAUD QUAD

 


Dear Indians,

Continuing from the last post on the betrayal by the Nalla PM and his band of elected and unelected mafia, I find that things go on as before. "1-inch bhi nahi denge." Again and again and again, the same stale fare. What happened at Naku La? As per the protocol, our shoorveers, had their regular boxing fixture with the Hans. Wait, was not the protocol supposed to be scrapped, or revised, or something? It seems public memory is short, especially when it comes to our saffron superheroes. Even Khan of blackbuck fame is thanking the Indian public today for their "ant memory. Vote BJP. Everything is forgotten."

Ding Dong in Pangong. Hindustan Times headlines chime, "India surprised by China's speed of withdrawing 200 tanks." Come March, and India will no longer be surprised if we hear Modi say, "koi nahi aaya." What our boys won in the Kailas range has been squandered in the Jaishankar way. He is the man whose nationalistic fervor has permanently capped India's H2 bomb. No wonder, the Prime Criminal admires his panache. It was the Chinese media which first published with glee that Emperor Xi had fooled the Indians once again by compelling to vacate the range in return for their withdrawal from north Pangong Tso. If the Hans had withdrawn till FP8 and the Indians until FP4, it would still have been more or less a bargain, but to give away Kailas range as a bonus requires 56-inch testicles.

And Mr. Ranknath, the dependable defense playboy, did not thump his chest. He did not have to. That was left to the godi media, as it trumpeted China's retreat. This is the popcorn nationalism being served to the masses. The simple analysis is that stinking Indian diplomacchi again played a weak hand. What was the need to go forward with this, or did Biden wash his hands off? The odds are stacked against China, and we dress this cheap compromise as a victory. This will keep the Indian public happy until March hoping for some Modi miracle and before they know, things will be worse than before. Xi is again using the Teaman's genius image against him.

The kisans of India should be rising up in arms against this betrayal of their own jawans. This fraud agreement should be rejected immediately. The withdrawal should be aborted. It is the ultimate hoax. "We lost nothing," says he. We lost our only bargaining chip, man! Any Gujju businessman would be ashamed of this cheap trade had he not been blinded by Gujarat ka gaurav.  How long will Modi continue to ride his luck? As long as the stock market continues to boom is the answer. There is an ironic parallel between Modi's ever increasing fame and the stock markets heights as the corona-hit economy continues to founder. Modi's bull run is contrary to India's weakening defenses. We have forgotten how to offend long back.

Now what do we have to bargain for all the remaining land in China's control? Look, how late our dash to the Kailash range was. It was always there for the taking, but Jaishankar was busy sipping wine with his Chinese counterparts, lest the Chinese get offended by some rash moves by our hot-blooded jawans. And then when we finally made a move and we gave it away so quickly. "Oh, don't worry Modi has many tricks up his sleeve. He is the greatest genius ever."

If Modi had any tricks, then this was the time to play them. The winter is holding the Chinese back. They are not likely to try a full-scale assault. We could have levelled Moldo. The Chinese are supposed to have three warships in the Gulf of Aden. We could have attacked them. That would have exposed the Chinese vulnerability. We would have our tails up, but the pseudonationalists think that as long as Modi is up, their safes will be full-up. Look at the Chinese, they are making haste slowly, but Gen. Ram Madhava of Sun Tzu school of RSS thought thinks that the Chinese want to win without fighting. It did not look like that in Galwan. It seems that sitting on the cushions of power has made the RSS cadre want to lose without fighting.

It is the RSS propagandists who are effusive in the praise for Sun Tzu. When was the last time that China won without fighting. Did China win the Opium war without fighting? Did Mao win the Long March without fighting? Was the Korean war or the Vietnam war or the 1962 war won without fighting? such cheap tricks by people who once used to sing praises of Bharat Mata. "China is upset because Modi is building infrastructure." The fact is Modi was not building anything for six years for the sake of keeping the Chinese happy in true Congress style, but the Chinese tried to push their luck and Modi is now trying to save face by going on a building spree. What this does is prolong his career, but wars are not won by construction or GDP or growth rate.

If your analysis is deceptive, your solutions are deceptive. What was England's GDP in the second World War? Did Germany lose because its GDP was less than Britain's? German rockets, airplanes, U-boats, and technology was among the best, but they lost in numbers, manpower, in the end, but in between they lost because the British cracked the German secret code and destroyed Germany's submarines. Wars are won by finding and striking the enemy's weaknesses. You do not have to be rhino to fight a rhino. So when Modi says he wants to build the GDP and the kisan must sacrifice for the nation's GDP, he is taking the public for an American ride. When Modi says he wants to build the arms industry, he is taking the Indian workers for a ride.

He will get away with it--that is why that scoundrel is so confident--but his ghost will not. This cheap conman is losing, but he is taking India with him. When we lost in 1962, our GDP was greater than China's, but we were not in the right frame of mind.  Nehru was trying to build a socialist utopia, and Modi is trying to build a capitalist one, but this is not the time for such deceptions. Recently, there was a cyber attack in USA attributed to Russia, but you know that the Americans are scared to blame the Chinese, but then what was the GDP of Russia to have conducted a cyber strike against the USA. It is about daring, man. You need guts. That is what Modi does not have. He does not need them, because he wins elections with camera tricks. God bless his putrid soul.

You win by making such moves and that is what we find lacking in this full-pant nationalism. The fake narratives spun by the American deep state (ADS) and the Indian deep state (IDS) are complementary. Lazy Joe wants "high competition" with China. Why should anyone compete with a villain? Good men should be taking the villains out of the competition. Good men should be cutting the oversized ambitions of Emperor Zi to size, but then we forget that democrats are not good men at all. They fool the American masses that it is about freedom, equality, and human rights. No, it is not an alliance of democracies.  It is the old hegemone, who sees an opportunity to make money with their planted agents in the IDS, and with that money they can put on a Hollywood-style democratic show.

They can buy all the journalists like Sudhir Chaudhary, Padmaja Joshi, CNN, BBC, and can paint any picture they want. They can divide the masses and make them fight fake freedom struggles. So what if they lose the Asian hemisphere to the Chinese? The Chinese will be bogged down in fights of supremacy and American economy will boom with all the weapons sales to its allies like Japan, Taiwan, Australia.  America will provide them with all the weapons that they need, but they will have to fight their fights of individualism with Xi. They have to deserve their freedoms, do not they? The ADS will play the supreme freedom consultant.

And then one fine day, America will unite with the Europeans and then destroy the Chinese and restore the world to its pristine democratic utopia. But Jaishankar and Doval (the unelected mafia) will not take it lying down. Taking a cue from their boss, Don Modi, they will strike belligerent autonomous poses and ladhte ladhte marne se pehle ek haseen compromise kar denge. Wow! What a great script!

Do we really need a quad? Bull shit!. A dyad would have sufficed. Then who needs this quad? The ADS and IDS need it to provide cover for their anti-human self serving agenda. America and India could intercept Chinese trade in the Indian ocean and send a message. We could make the Indian Ocean a no-go zone for the Chinese navy and put it in its place. Such a strategy would automatically nip Xi's ambitions, but then what would happen to the free-market principles of the American left. Was World War II won on free market principles or was the free market imposed afterwards?

America is in the western hemisphere, but China knows that it cannot dominate Asia without completely subduing India, but it is apparent that the RSS-BJP combine would like to fatten their purses and be subservient to anybody who wields the stick.  All their slogans are only for the masses. They are cunning rascals who are just beginning to enjoy how they can make the masses eat from their laps.

We are in the line of fire. We cannot evade the enemy. We need to be on the aggressive. What are the likely scenarios? Let us begin with the worst-case scenario:

1. We begin the war and its ends in a catastrophic nuclear exchange and all the Vikas ends in the drain. Old Gandhian line, but for ignorant people it can play on their minds. "After all, we do not know anything, let the experts decide. Who wants to take that risk? What Doval and Jaishankar and the great Modi decide should be good for India. Let us keep our mouth shut." First of all, Xi would be the last person to end China with a catastrophic strike. As for Vikas bubbles, what happened after WWII, most of the European nations were reduced to rubble, even Japan, but voila, they bounced back and became richer than us and we were stuck with the Hindu growth rate. Yes, we were not crazy for money like them, but they became richer and they started playing their old games and reluctantly we also joined the race, but in the process, we compromised with our nationalism and Hinduism and made it a bazaaru version of EuroAmerican politics. The problem is now we may lose Vikas, but we are likely to bounce back with an Americanized Hindu faith rather than dharma based on the present state of affairs. In the life of nations, destruction and creation are a continual cycle, but the national model that we have today is more of a filmi model than anything. Let us focus on authenticating our model rather than worrying about disastrous consequences.

2. The second scenario is that we fight and lose a conventional battle against the Hans. Bad for BJP-RSS pseudonationalism and pseudoHindutva, but not for Bharat, because Bharat always learns from its mistakes and grows healthy and strong, but not the Pappus and Fekus. We lost in Panipat but then we bounced back. We lost in 1857 and we are still waiting to bounce back. In Panipat, we had the larger army, but the smaller enemy positioned us out. Today, we are giving away our Himalayan and Indian ocean advantage seduced by American promises of Vikas with a fake yogi like Modi and his would be successor Daityanath.

3. The last and the most realistic scenario is that we start with the small victories, the battle of Ghodkhind, the battle of Torna, the battle of Pratapgad, and we find our real Shivajis, our real Tanhajis and chuck these 56-inches offered by the market, but that would require a long-term commitment, depth of character, and firmness of values, which are absent in the RSS class. "Let us go back to our Vikas, no! I cannot live without him!" World War II was not won in 10 days. The battle for global hegemony is likely to last longer, but at present the Gaurav Aryas are already celebrating Parakram Divas without any parakram in Pangong.

Any future war taxes must come from the Chinese trade in the Indian ocean. That is how we should make our war plans, but that is too much to expect from a 56-inch chaukidar, isn't it? He has sold out our jawans for his propaganda victories. He is beyond redemption. Nobody can save him from himself. He is he orignal TRP fixer, promising to build "Sonaar Baangla" in five years without building a "Sonaar Punjab or Maharashtra." Their tongue is very fast; everything else takes time. Next four years will be the end of Modi, RSS, a BJP. A court martial like Trump, however, is least likely.

The fact is there are very few nationalist journalists in the free market media who would be interested in discussing such hard facts, but if by mistake this post of mine reaches the screen of any journalist in India who knows what nationalism is about, then it is his or her sole responsibility to ensure that these facts get disseminated far and wide. The same holds true for any true nationalist in Japan, Taiwan, Australia, Philippines, etc. Do not wait to fight in the South China Sea. If the Indian Ocean falls to China, the rest will fall like nine pins. Do not let sleepy Joe deceive you. 

REMINDER:  You can save India by sharing this post. Do your bit.

14 comments:

  1. Another dubious decision by the government:

    India to clear 45 investments from China, likely to include Great Wall, SAIC: Report

    https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-to-clear-45-investments-from-china-likely-to-include-great-wall-saic-report-101613987396064.html

    This is particularly disgraceful given that Beijing has had the temerity to blame us for the Galwan atrocity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Modi thinks that he can bribe Xi with contracts and sell the lie to Indians that his tough line forced Xi to withdraw.

      Delete
  2. Article is on less of facts and more on hate towards modi and RSS-BJP. The way it started with words like Nalla, says all about it. Feeling sorry that I wasted 15 mong minutes on reading this crap

    ReplyDelete
  3. Article is on less of facts and more on hate towards modi and RSS-BJP. The way it started with words like Nalla, says all about it. Feeling sorry that I wasted 15 mong minutes on reading this crap

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the fact that you wasted 15 minutes after nalla shows that you found something of worth though you are finding it difficult to admit it. If you had really found any crap, you would have talked about it. You can still talk about it if you find any. As for Modi and RSS-BJP, and you, I will have more to say in the days to come

      Delete
  4. The situation is even worse than this. We are making a grievous strategic error which will haunt us for generations to come.

    What we should have done is this:

    1) Dismantle Pakistan - thereby leaving us with only one land border to worry about.

    2) Use the fact that we can now concentrate on one border to compel the Chinese to come to terms on settling the border dispute once and for all, (as they have done with Myanmar).

    3) Free of the need for a large standing army, we can then shift our attention towards developing a world-class navy, which, in the course of a few decades, will enable us to replace the United States as the world's pre-eminent maritime power.

    What we are doing instead is getting bogged down in intractable territorial disputes that result in us having to sacrifice any naval ambitions in order to maintain a large force on our borders. We are allying with naval powers who are more than happy to see India stuck in this morass.

    Worst of all, almost no one in India realizes this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. replacing the united states is a far cry, just tell me how you plan to dismantle Pakistan

      Delete
  5. The dismantling of Pakistan commences with a declaration of war and a full-scale invasion. I wrote an entire book about it two decades ago - 'The Case for Total War: Solving the Pakistan Problem with Blood and Iron'.

    Once we defeat the Pakistani army (no difficult task, given our military, economic and political superiority), we sort out the provinces as follows:

    1) Balochistan - given independence. Serves as a buffer state between India and Iran.

    2) NWFP - returned to Afghanistan. Greater Afghanistan is another buffer state between India and Iran.

    3) POK - reunited with India and made part of the Union Territory of Kashmir.

    4) Sindh - reunited with India as another state.

    5) Punjab - options available:
    a) reunited with India as another state.
    b) reunited with India as a number of states and union territories.
    c) divided, with part returning to India and the remainder being divided into a number of independent city states.

    ReplyDelete
  6. but how to neutralize Pakistan's nuclear arsenal? do you have any ideas? do you have a twitter ID where we can discuss this further?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Regarding nuclear weapons, there are two ways to approach the issue.

    I) We can assume that they actually exist - in which case, it's simply a matter of calling Islamabad's bluff, by pointing out that if they resort to using nuclear weapons, we will retaliate so severely, that they will lose absolutely everything.

    Pakistanis may be stupid, but they are not suicidal.

    II) We can assume that they do not exist, and therefore proceed without worry.

    I'm not on twitter, but I'm more than happy to discuss details on your blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry for the delay, but I am wondering why you think that Sindh should unite with India, while Punjab should stay divided and why should NwfP go with Afghanistan? and what if after blood and iron policy we have to exit from Sindh and Punjab just as we did from Sri Lanka or US is doing from Afghanistan?

      Delete
  8. Three reasons why Sindh should be held while Punjab divided:

    a) Demographic: Sindh has a much smaller population than Punjab (less than five crore as opposed to over ten crore) and therefore will be easier to assimilate (and would not change the demographic balance in India much). Sindhi Muslims are also less fanatical than their Punjabi counterparts - if only because they still have a noticeable non-Muslim population in that province.

    b) Psychological: Sindhis are renowned as a mercantile, trading community, and would easily understand the benefit of being part of Bharat and thereby gaining unfettered access to the massive Indian market. I don't expect any such understanding from the Pakistani Punjabis.

    c) Political: Punjabis benefit from being the dominant community in Pakistan, and therefore are likely to resent its dismantling and to oppose Indian hegemony (albeit in vain). For Sindhis, integration into India means the end of Punjabi domination - a favourable outcome for them.

    NWFP is comprised of Pashtuns and as such, they should be reunited with their brethren in Afghanistan. Moreover, this would end the entire dispute in that region over the Durand Line - and would also earn considerable goodwill and gratitude in Kabul. Trying to rule the NWFP is a headache we should avoid.

    The entire purpose of the blood and iron policy is to eliminate Pakistan and extend India. Eliminating a country and extending one's territory was not the purpose of the IPKF mission in Sri Lanka or the US misadventure in Afghanistan: therefore these two are simply not comparable. A much better comparison would be the Chinese takeover of Tibet or our own liberation of Goa. The destruction of Pakistan will be bloodier than those two - but the end result will be the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We have failed to integrate Kashmir into India, not even Hyderabad. As for Sindhis, GM Syed was Jinnah's main partner in creation of Pakistan. They want Sindhu desh, not integration with India, do you have some special integration formula which makes you so optimistic?

      Delete
    2. I'm optimistic because no separatist movement in India has succeeded post-independence.

      I'll end this conversation with an article which should get us thinking on the right lines:

      Great Power or Great Pity?

      https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/great-power-or-great-pity/218115

      Delete