Pages

Tuesday, 13 November 2018

TWO STATE SOLUTION, MARKANDEYA KATJU-(M.K)-GANDHI



Dear Earthlings,


As you know, Mr. Katju is a great critic of MK Gandhi whom he calls a British agent, but what I want to draw your attention to is that Mr.  Katju not only shares his initials with him but also shares the same opinions about Muslims.  Mr.  Katju makes the startling statement that 99% of Pakistanis are good people.  Now any Indian will contest that.  So Mr. Katju has to provide solid proof for his claim.  Since he is an ex-SC judge, he might manufacture evidence but let us remind him that at least 4% of Pakistanis voted for Tehreek-e-Labbaik, so he has an uphill task and how come 96% of Pakistanis and a similar number of Bangladeshis want an Islamic state so badly if they are so good.


Now some university students have flattered this gullible judge that his views are in great demand and he has given us eight tips for a revolution, but the problem is if your premise is faulty, the results will be disastrous.  MK Gandhi also believed in the common syncretic culture of Hindus and Muslims and that is why he based his approach on Eeshwar Allah tero naam.  MK Gandhi was also unilateralist in his approach like ex-justice MK.   That is why they are two sides of the same coin.


What Mr. Katju ignores is that Muslims do not share his views.  So Mr. Katju's opinions are not really based on some serious consideration, but maybe on the recent predilection for all kinds of retired gentlemen to hop on to the peace lecture circuit.  To burnish his secular credentials, he of course considers Akbar and Tipu to be his heroes.  He also shares a scientific temper with the British whom he claims to despise.


He also has claimed that his knowledge is deeper than most intellectuals today.  Our English gentleman wants to industrialise India just like the British would.  He wants us to overtake the Chinese.  He ignores that industrialization with cheap labor itself leads to poverty.  His uniform civil code is a secular version of the uniform Jihadi code.  He is right about democracy.  In fact democratic politics is based on artificial right and left divide while caste is based on organic inequality.


But the biggest ballast of them all is his obsession with unification of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.  One needs to be really thick skulled to imagine a secular union with Muslims.  The love for India displayed in the party circuit is nothing compared to the hatred that is propagated through every Muslim institution in Pakistan and Bangladesh.  How can there be any serious comparison of the reunification of Vietnam and Germany with that of India?


The problem is the fake news media gives importance to anything that can create controversy.  It helps to showcase our ostentatious freedoms to the western galleries.  The problem is that the mindset of Mr. Katju gives us some insight of the cavalier approach of the justice system when it comes to Muslims.  The judges seem to be acquiring a globalist mindset rather than a factual mindset.  There is no difference between the SC of India, America, or UK.  All of them plagiarise with gay abandon from each other's constitutional copybook.  


The architect of the Pakistan problem or the Palestine two state solution is one and the same, the Englishman.  Katju preaching same culture to Muslims of Pakistan is like Israel preaching about sharing one God to Arab jihadis.  Katju opposing Gandhi is like Modi opposing Nehru and then making back room deals with Mehbooba like Nehru did with Abdullah.  THE ONLY SOLUTION FOR PALESTINE OR KASHMIR IS DEISLAMISATION.  Reunification without deIslamisation will be even more disastrous than Partition.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing this post, and donating.  Do your bit.

2 comments:

  1. Dear Friend,

    How are the British the architect of the Palestinian problem? The Jews took the land with a legitimate agreement from the British who (the British) were occupiers then. The land originally belonged to the Jews. The Palestinians refused to live with the new reality though at many times an agreement could be reached for two states.

    India's problem is also not of British making. They (the British) left. Hari Singh acceded to India and we failed to take care of our land. Hence the Nehru Bashing. He was not visionary enough particularly on Foreign Policy and on keeping India's interests paramount.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. then the british should have got rid of the palestinians before they created a divided Israel, if pakistan was not created, then kashmir problem would never have arisen, hari singh acceded only after british led pak army had entered kashmir

      Delete