FULL SPECTRUM JIHADI CLASSIFICATION

Dear Earthlings,


The latest Sri Lankan bombings again expose the lacunae in the global approach to countering Islamic terrorism.  As in Strasbourg, the suspects like Zahran Hashim were under surveillance for an agonizing period of time and despite warnings from the former justice minister, Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, no action was taken and to the contrary he was ridiculed as an anti-Muslim bigot.

VIDEO: WHAT SPIRITUAL JIHAD

The focus of antiterror activities seems to be to target only those who are on the verge of violence and keep the rest of them under perennial watch.  So Trump and company discuss whether to ban the Muslim Brotherhood because as per some human rights activists, banning any ideology is illegal.  This kind of argument is dishonest and dogmatic and overlooks the fact that any organization like Hizb-ut-Tahrir, Jamaat-e-Islami, or Tablighi Jamaat which preaches Islamic supremacism ultimately supports violence against non-muslims.


Such specious arguments are made by western ideologues with the sole intention of protecting their own political, military, and economic interests which are deeply enmeshed with global international Islamic terrorism.  This is the worst kind of treachery and tyranny unleashed by these nations who lay claim to modernity.  These human rights activists are in fact non-muslim devil's advocates of Islamic terror.


Support to terrorism may not be just violent as in the case of jihadi brides like Shamima Begum.  But hours are wasted on television pouring buckets of liberal benevolence on her thick skull.  Liberals drool over her and plead for her to be brought back and rehabilitated.  This vulgar display of affection for such deviants is passed off as free speech.  A slave of a jihadi also furthers jihad ideals.


So the purpose of this post is to have a commonsense classification of jihadis as opposed to the dubious classification into radicals, extremists, Islamists, moderates, sufis etc favored by western deceivers.  These deceitful terminologies conveniently overlook the fact that soft jihad forms the most important submerged component of the tip of the jihadi iceberg.  These devious politicians manipulate their own populations into believing these farcical antiradicalization strategies of theirs.


Soft jihad ranges from preaching, and financing, to lying and giving fake justifications for jihad like poverty and freedom fighting.  There are blue collar jihadis who indulge in mob violence against non-Muslims in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and other Islamic colonies.  In fact, the most common kind of jihad is mob jihad.  This is the oldest form of violence against nonMuslims, but this will be dismissed today by liberals as just communal violence.  Kidnapping non-muslim females for forcible marriage is also an act of blue collar jihad.


White collar jihadis are overground sympathizers of blue collar jihadis like Mehbooba Mufti and Omar Abdullah who bleed for stone pelters and Hizbul Mujahideen.  Another flagrant example would be Imran Khan Niazi, who despite being an apology of a Muslim himself, allies with Islamist parties.  These people are called munafiqs in Islamic parlance and play both ways and therefore are in great demand for wheeler dealers from Europe and America and are classified as moderates by them.


The Islamic preacher is the biggest proponent of hate towards non-Muslims, be it Zakir Naik or Anwar-al-Awlaki.  Yet there are no grounds to curb Islamic preaching in any way in modern free market regimes.  Salafist mosques and madrasas continue to be built with alacrity across the globe.  These are the jihadi production centres.  Young muslims are trained in a 7th century murderous delusion right under our very nose and these are the young trainee jihadis who will take up the mantle of jihad in the future.  Who has ever heard of such a thing?  If Abu Hamza had been sent to a training camp in Xinjiang, he could have become a better person, but then what excuse would the US have to prolong its stay in Afghanistan?


How can one forget feminist jihadis? After all, there was one in the Sri Lankan bombing.  From mummifying themselves in burkhas, to licking/swearing on the Quran, to storming mosques, to preaching pacifist Islam, to driving cars, this is a truly EuroAmerican product for which these barbarians deserve full credit.  From Pinky pirni, to Mona Alam, and Shireen Mazhari to Maleeha Lodhi the list of these highly paid slaves of Islam is endless and growing.


There are branded jihadis in the service of multinational corporations like Al-Qaeda and ISIS and nonbranded jihadis like National Tawheed Jamaat which can be found in every Islamic street a dime a dozen.  The former are decorated with recognition by the American and European villains while the latter are too insignifcant in their view because they do not have the reach to target the supervillains of international politics.


There are international jihadis and regional jihadis.  International jihadis focus on global jihad.  Region jihadis focus on torturing the nonMuslims into Islam like the Awami League and the BNP.  But the recruits from all these groups are interoperable.


There are diluted jihadis and concentrated jihadis.  Concentrated jihadis are found in Islamized colonies like Kashmir, Maldives, ghettos.  Diluted jihadis are found in soon to be concentrated regions like Indonesia, or where nonMuslims are in significant number.  Dilution is often the result of mass migration.  They are carriers of jihadi memes.  Their murderous intentions await full expression.  These are latent jihadis whose violent tendencies may remain submerged for  a long time if not carefully dissected and exposed, like Nidal Malik Hasan.


There are intelligence jihadis, like John Brennan and Ajit Doval.  These people convert to Islam because they are told that they are doing a great service to their country by extracting secret information from the enemy, but the reality is that these people get used by politicians to serve their narrow interests and end up harming humanity as a whole.  The intelligence agencies are the biggest facilitators of conversion to Islam, because in their short-sighted view that is the only way to infiltrate and avert terrorism.


What about the jihad fan club, the followers of terrorists and preachers like Zakir Naik?  Do they not come under the definition of jihadis?  If these people are not counseled, will terrorism ever end?  But for all that, all these western hypocrisies of terrorism being a fringe activity will have to be junked.


Last but not the least, have you ever come across any innocent jihadis?  Those innocent kids whom their parents have named after jihadis like Taimur, Burhan, Osama fall in this category.  A little parental counseling could go a long way, but "is that the job of modern governments?"


AL**H IS THE BIGGEST ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST AND ANYBODY WHO BELIEVES IN AL**H IS ON THE PATH OF ISLAMIC TERRORISM.  This is the plain reality and knowing this reality is the only way forward.  All other anti-terror measures will fall short and show scant regard for human intelligence.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing this post and donating.  Do your bit.

CHRISTCHURCH VIGILANTISM

Dear Earthlings,


Some have characterized the attack on a mosque in NZ as a terrorist attack.  Other liberals have waxed eloquent about right wing terrorism, white supremacism, racism and the like.  Extreme liberals have portrayed the Islamic herd as the victim of global terrorism rather than the perpetrator.  As usual, popular journalistic discourse completely distorts the reality and reflects the dominance of electonomics.

VIDEO-DEFINITION OF ISLAMIC TERRORISM

First of all, like Brevik, this man was an isolated case.  There is no organized network of white supremacists behind this unless you are counting the UN, IMF, World Bank, EU, NATO as such, which they are.  On the other hand, there is an organized international network of Islamic terrorists for more than 1400 years who swear by sharia, which has been the agenda of the terrorist for a millenium, characterized by the OIC.


Mosques and madrasas are the principal purveyors of sharia, and far from being associated with religion, they play an important role in brainwashing young gullible Islams about their real goals.  The international human rights mafia completely overlooks the dubious activities of mosques, adding to the helplessness of its human victims.  The American alliance with the triumvirate of international jihad i.e. Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan sets the tone for the international approach to Islamic terrorism.


Weak but prosperous countries like NZ toe the line of their American masters when it comes to dhimmitude.  The terror attack in Germany hardly made a blip on anybody's radar, but Jacinda Ardern's unlimited bag of theatrics charts new heights.  Why does she have to quote Mohammad?  Why do NZ policewomen have to wear scarves? Why does the Friday azaan need to be televised?  Are gun violence and terrorism the same?


How come those who claim to fight hate have nothing to say about hate in the sharia?  What happened in Christchurch was just a preemptive attack from a vigilante who was legitimately concerned about an Islamic demographic invasion.  Lampooning such concerns as racism only adds to the backlash and that is exactly what these liberals want.  They want proxy wars at home and abroad.  ELECTONOMICS WILL NOT TOLERATE FACTS.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing this post and donating.  Do your bit.

MODI NAHI TO MUMKIN KYON NAHI

Dear Bhartiyas,

The BJP always comes up with new taglines.  Last time it was India shining.  Before that, it was a party with a difference.  This time, they have stooped to a new low.  Modi hai to mumkin hai.  Yes, Modi has become the biggest USP of the BJP.  If Modi is projected as PM, then BJP can come close to the half way mark.  Even if BJP does not perform and achieve its targets, they can still use the Modi brand name to get the audience.

LAST VIDEO: DEFINITION OF HUMAN

Nobody is asking now kiske acche din aaye.  95% of electoral bonds are said to be in favor of the BJP.  That is why the BJP is reluctant to think beyond Modi.  Modi is a windfall for the dalaals of Hindutva.  Hindutva can wait forever, but the BJP dalaals cannot afford to lose power.  Nobody is bothered that Modi does not have the answers to the nationalist questions.  'Just get elected and then then keep tinkering with Hindutva and nationalism.'

What is Modi's agenda in 2019?  Apart from striking some strident postures at the fag end of his first tenure, he is simply not bothered.  The ignorant masses need this fake saviour.  What if Pappu Gandhi becomes PM?  This is the number one fear that is being exploited by the evil chaiwala from Gujarat.

But destiny may still seal Modi's fate.  The mahagatbandhan in UP might achieve what the ignorant voters could not.  India needs a stable govt for 30 years according to the off-colour NSA Ajit Doval.  Can you imagine their insouciance?  These people have no 30-year program to implement, but they need you to vote for them irrespective of that for 30 years, otherwise it is your fault, not theirs.  In their scheme of things, super DUPER man Modi is indispensable.

But a Hindu intellectual should beg to differ.  THE CULT OF 56-INCH TONGUED MODI HAS OVERSHADOWED THE NATIONAL INTEREST.  What does the nation need should be the question that every Hindu intellectual should ask?

The nation needs:

1.  Fast track anti-terror courts, anticorruption courts, antir*pe courts.
2.  Detalibanization drive in mosques and madrasas in the whole of India, but especially Kashmir.
3.  Antijihad education in all institutions of higher learning.
4.  Ram mandir, abolition of 370 & 35A, reinstatement of 497 and 377

Does anybody think that Modi can achieve even one of these targets?  The answer is no.  The dalaals of Hindutva are so obsessed with Modi's popularity that they are going to do nothing to disturb it.  They are going to milk it to their economic advantage.  If Modi wins a second term, he will only go down and down, because he really is not serious about anything.

What has Modi achieved in 5 years?  Is Pakistan any less hostile?  Has he put an end to black money?  Is counterfeit money not being printed?  Has anyone been convicted for printing fake currency?  How many corrupt people have been punished?  How many terrorists have the courts convicted?  What happened to Make in India?  Modi himself said that HAL is incapable of making Rafale in India?

What happened to our mountain divisions?  Gadkari says that they have built more roads than Congress, but what happened to road construction at the China border?  If there are no funds for defence budget, then why build more shauchalayas?  Modi asks agar Rafale hota to?  But I ask IF S400 HOTA TO?  The US lobby is very much in favor of Modi (Kotler award) and wants him to continue as PM, but in the process we might be forced to play second fiddle to the US agenda again.  It is about time we tilted back again towards Russia, but I doubt whether Modi wants that.

The extent to which Modi has hyped the two surgical strikes for electoral benefit is unprecedented.  His newly announced reservations and opposition to SC/ST amendment show how far this wretch is willing to go to hold on to power.  His last budget was completely populist.

So let us try to reimagine India without this street juggler called Modi.  If SP wins 20 seats in UP, then Mulayam Singh Yadav can be offered the PM's post provided he promises to adhere to at least point #1 of the nationalist agenda above.  Now, which nationalist politician will refuse fast track antiterror courts or antir*pe courts.  If Modi can give up nationalism for the sake of power, then Mulayam can be a nationalist for the sake of power.

If not Mulayam, maybe Naidu, maybe Patnaik, maybe someone else, but getting Modi out of the picture means that Modi's slumbering slaves will get activated.  They could not stand up to Modi, but back seat driving is much more exciting.  Besides, this will be a good template to prepare for the future, because Modi might get a heart attack some day and then what will BJP do without its superstar campaigner?

How long will they fool Rambhaktas with the excuse that they did not have the numbers?  If BJP cannot deliver, then Ram bhaktas will form more parties.  If we can have congress mukta Bharat, we can have RSS-BJP mukta Bharat also?  We cannot wait eternally for these scumbags to deliver.

The first point in the nationalist agenda will ensure that the courts start executing antinational jihadis as well as antinational politicians and dalaals of US and China and thus will be set into motion an agenda of national cleansing and resurgence.

REMINDER:  You can save India by understanding, educating, sharing this post and donating.  Do your bit.

PULWAMA GAMECHANGER

Dear Earthlings,


Pulwama terrorist attack has left much of India in shock.  Most Indians want revenge.  TV anchors play on people's sentiments and demand some kind of action, but none of them wants to elaborate on the matter.  The jingoistic approach of most TV stations is for their own commercial benefit.  Hardly anyone of them is focusing on the Islamic angle.


Even military experts rant repeatedly about what we did in 1971, often contributing to much mirth amongst Pakistani jihadis.  Much has been said about two front war, but the fact is we cannot even face one front war.  The spectre of two front war has only been used to make costly purchases with no coordination between different wings of the military.  The sole purpose has been to grease the palms of our ex-generals who increasingly like their political masters have developed an appetite for corruption.


The military experts seem to be working for some arms lobby or other, precluding any chance of them strategizing from the Indian threat perception point of view.  People had a lot of expectations from 56" Modi, but increasingly, Modi's call for action seems to be as hollow as "mandir wahi banayenge."  When he says that he has given a free hand to the army, it feels as if now it is the army's headache.  When world over, it is the navy and airforce, which are playing increasing role in combat, it is still our IInd world war vintage army that is the mainstay of defence.


The very minimum fallout of the Pulwama attack should be that Indian intellectuals should vote with their feet to kick out the conman Modi from power if he fails to be true to his word yet again.  The Indian navy is about 4-5 times the size of the Pakistan navy.  In spite of having such overwhelming advantage, and such costly purchases like the Barak missile, the P8I, the Scorpene, the Vikramaditya, etc, if we cannot use it to our advantage, then the question is WHAT FAVORABLE RATIO WOULD DO THE TRICK?


Modi, in contrast to Nehru, seems to be interested in an all-aligned policy, open market for everybody and unwilling to displease anybody.  Today, I am putting my neck out to offer a course of action to break away from the shackles that have been imposed on us by our nonperforming leaders, bureaucrats and diplomats.  I fear that the Indian response is curtailed not from within but by various lobbyists working for various foreign powers.


Every time, there is cross border firing, we blow up a few bunkers across the line of control.  Why cannot the Indian navy attack and destroy 4 Pak naval ships for 4 buses destroyed during Pulwama attack?  In 1971, our navy raided Karachi port, why cannot we repeat such raids on Gwadar port in support of Balochis against Pak terror.  A raid is not a war.  We attack and retreat.  Will Pakistan attack Mumbai and Kandla in return?  Then that will give us an opportunity to destroy the Pak navy which is the smallest arm of the Pak forces.


Why do not we target Pak cargo vessels to compensate our soldiers killed in daily encounters?  Our politicians think that politics is about sloganeering.  It is time to change their perception.  From now on, NO POLITICIAN WITHOUT AN ANTITERROR POLICY SHOULD BE ELECTED TO POWER.  If the Pak navy is weakened, it will create more opportunities for us to make further penetrative strikes from the Pakistan coastline.


Wars are won when you make surprise moves which catch your opponent off guard.  Look how MBS gave a 20 billion dollar loan to Pakistan, but the only moves that Modi can make are with his 56" tongue.  Why did not he ask for advance emergency delivery of  S400 missiles from Russia?  If Russia cannot make an emergency delivery, then why did not he ask at least two batteries of S400 missiles on lease for 3 months?  Within 3 months, the whole Pak airforce could be finished if we but had the intent.  If not why did he not make emergency buys of two additional batteries of second-hand S400 missiles at half price?


If Modi made these moves, we could change the outcome of this brewing confrontation in days.  But Modi is too preoccupied with winning the next elections.  As the public slowly begins to forget, Modi will try to bluff his way by making growling noises or at the most try to hit some camps across the border in POK and sell it as proof of his indomitable will to the largely ignorant Indian masses.


Today, we are losing, because our leaders are busy fighting elections and nothing else.  Our overrated diplomats are busy practising peace duets.  Why cannot they sell this simple deal to Putin?  Does Putin think that he can beat the US and the Chinese bid at the Pak-taliban auction?  A Pakistan with a weak navy and airforce will be more amenable to Russian leverage.  A Syria-like intervention is offering itself on a platter.  The Russians and the Indians should be planning for regime change in Pakistan.  And what do we do?  Just standby and let the Taliban become the heroes.


Cannot we see regime change in Pakistan will have such a profound reorientation of the whole global calculus?  Putin can ease the pressure off Venezuela by a simple move in Pakistan.  An already clueless Trump will be begging for answers, but our diplomats are snoring in their blazers.  Bang! Bang! Bang! This is one gamechanger we just cannot afford to miss.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing the post and donating.  Do your bit.

TWITTER'S CORPORATE TYRANNY

Dear Earthlings,

I have joined twitter since September 2018 and my handle satishb@antijihadclass has the aim of eradicating Islamic terrorism by 2100.  This is because most mainstream journalists like to portray Islam as a religion of peace because the majority of Muslims are peaceful and have got nothing to to with terrorism.  This is the most specious argument because Islam is not decided by majority vote, but by what is in the Quran and the example of Mohammed which is used by Muslims to justify all their perverse choices.  This is a uniquely Islamic way of doing things and majority or minority has got nothing to do with it.  In fact, the minority of mullahs and terrorists hold great sway over the majority of peaceful Muslims who know very well not to antagonize this small but influential minority as Salman Taseer of Pakistan discovered to his own detriment.

LATEST VIDEO:  DEFINITION OF HUMAN

Laura Loomer was permanently banned from Twitter in November 2018 citing hateful conduct after a tweet criticizing Ilhan Omar and her faith.  In the tweet in question, Loomer called Omar "anti Jewish" and said she is a member of a religion in which "homosexuals are oppressed" and "women are abused" and "forced to wear the hijab."  Loomer insisted that she did not violate Twitter's terms. "Everything I said is 100 percent true and factual. It's not malicious, it's not mean, it's not hateful," she said.

I totally agree with Loomer.  This is legitimate criticism.  This cannot be the reason for banning people from social media.  Even the twitter account, Imam of Peace, had complained that he received a notice from Twitter for violating Pakistan's blasphemy laws for flagging a tweet that called on Australian police to investigate extremism in mosques following a deadly knife attack in Melbourne in November.  So now, will jihadi colonies like Pakistan have a veto on what is written regarding Muslims and Islam? 

Even Saudi Canadian activist, Ensaf Haider, received a similar notice for violating Pakistani laws.  Twitter wrote to her concerning a tweet which showed a woman wearing the Islamic full veil, with the caption: “Retweet if you’re against niqab.”  Haider said, “I’m very shocked by Twitter. They want to silence any voice telling the truth.”

Antony Furey, the Toronto Sun op-ed editor was startled to learn he stood accused of insulting the Prophet Mohammad on receiving legal notice from Twitter.  His perceived offence was to post cartoons of the Prophet years ago.   Furey, who detailed his experience in a column for his newspaper  said: “I’m somewhat alarmed that Twitter would even allow a country to make a complaint like this, as it almost validates their absurd blasphemy laws.”   But he added: “One troubling consequence to all of this is that even people in countries without these blasphemy laws may start to self-censor for fear of the reach foreign governments will have over them in the online world.”
Pakistan has previously threatened to block Twitter if the company did not remove content its government found offensive.  It banned Facebook for hosting allegedly blasphemous content for two weeks in 2010 while YouTube was unavailable from 2012 to 2016 over an amateur film about the Prophet Mohammad that led to global riots.  I received the following message from Twitter yesterday:

Hi satishb, Your account, @antijihadclass has been locked for violating the Twitter Rules. Specifically for: Violating our rules against hateful conduct. You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease. satishb @antijihadclass @FrankBenSaor @Imamofpeace less muslims less trouble more muslims more trouble [...] RT Violating our rules against abusive behavior. You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so. We consider abusive behavior an attempt to harass, intimidate, or silence someone else’s voice. satishb @antijihadclass @ashoktewari @MakrandParanspe @shahid_siddiqui they should be asked to give up sharia or lose their human status, closure of masjids and madrasas promoting sharia, if they resist, death Please note that repeated violations may lead to a permanent suspension of your account. Proceed to Twitter now to fix the issue with your account. Go to Twitter

In the first tweet, I have pointed out the relationship between the proportion of muslims and the likely trouble that they may cause as their population increases.  Now this is borne out by simple observation and common sense.  What hateful conduct does this imply?  Where is the harassment or threat?

In the second tweet, very succinctly, I have pointed out the role of sharia in Islamic terrorism.  Implementation of sharia is the prime demand of any Islamic terrorist organization.  Sharia is prejudicial to humanity and far from being of divine origin as is routinely preached to young, unsuspecting Muslim kids, it is totally jihadi in origin.  It has no respect for human life, intellect, women's dignity, and criminal in character.  No sensible anti-terror program can overlook the malevolence inherent in sharia.  I have therefore pitched for a ban on sharia and its malicious propaganda.  In the process, a ban on masjids and madrasas promoting sharia is inevitable.  We all know what happened in the Lal Masjid case in Pakistan.  If jihadis use these madrasas as headquarters for resisting humanity, then death penalty for them is the natural consequence.

Where is the abusive behavior?  Should we be glorifying sharia?  Is sharia so benevolent to women?  Is asking for a ban on sharia incitement?  Is calling for an end to preaching of sharia silencing 'someone's' voice?  does the voice of the mulla not need to be silenced? Does anybody think that those who used their belief to justify the violation of Yazidi women deserve equal human status?

Twitter is being guided by populist western principles to determine what constitutes Islamophobia and what doesn't.  Only facts can determine what is just and unjust, not some vague western concepts of human rights.   The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) had clearly stated in 2003 that sharia law is incompatible with human rights, but in 2018, it flip flopped and opted to listen to a petition to have sharia law parallel to European laws.  However,  On 22 January 2019, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted a Resolution entitled “Sharia, the Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights.” This Resolution - although non-binding - is of major political importance, as it reflects an awareness that Islamic law constitutes a competing legal-religious order to the law of Western modernity, both in Europe and at the universal level. The PACE is “greatly concerned about the fact that Sharia law – including provisions which are in clear contradiction with the Convention – is applied, either officially or unofficially, in several Council of Europe member States, or parts thereof.”  

Obviously, Twitter is not updated with respect to these latest reformations in the human rights paradigm of Europe, although the UN and American officials also seem to be napping at the moment, but we do not need to be told by the human rights inspectors of America and Europe what constitutes human values and what do not, because we go by the facts.

REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing the post, and donating.  Do your bit.

MOHAMMAD AND TAIPING REBELLION

Dear Earthlings,


For many Muslims, the prophethood of Mohammad is a miracle that is self-evident from his victories against the numerically superior Arabic tribes under seemingly hopeless conditions.  Only Allah and his angels could have stolen victory for the Muslims from the jaws of defeat.  The victories of the jihadi armies over the Persian empire and the Byzantines confirm their belief.  They take great pride in having defeated both the superpowers in Afghanistan and predict the eventual Islamic victory over all non-Muslims.


However, today we are going to find a simple explanation for this phenomenon by comparing it to a parallel occurrence in distant China.  The Taiping rebellion and story of Hong Xiuquan bears striking resemblance to the story of Islam and Mohammad.  Hong traveled to Guangzhou to take the imperial examinations but failed to pass and met a missionary, Edwin Stevens, preaching Christianity whose assistant Liang Fa gave him some pamphlets on Christianity.  In Mohammad's time there were many converts called Hanifs who preached some missionary-based belief systems.


After three failed attempts to pass the examination, Hong had a nervous breakdown.  He was delirious for many days and hallucinated about visiting heaven where God gave him a sword to fight demons.  He saw Confucius being punished for leading people astray.  Mohammad also claimed to visit Heaven on a ladder and meet God personally.


Hong claimed that he was the brother of Jesus and had been entrusted with the task of ridding the world of demon worship.  He began by burning all Confucian and Buddhist statues and books in his house.  Mohammad too began by preaching against idolatry in Mecca.  Hong's first converts were his close relatives and so were Mohammad's.  Hong's iconoclasm invited opposition from others and he was exiled just like Mohammad.


Hong studied Christianity under the Southern Baptist misionary, Issachar Jacox Roberts.  Mohammad also studied Christianity under his converted cousin Waraqa.  Some of Hong's followers started having trances of their own in which they claimed to have direct messages from God and Jesus.  Mohammad claimed that he received messages from Allah and his angel Jibril.  Many Arabs inspired by Mohammed started claiming to be prophets themselves, prominent amongst whom was Mussaylima who claimed to be a partner of Mohammed.


Mohammad claimed that his Quran was the original book of God, while Hong claimed that his Taiping Bible was the original version of the ancient religion of China which had been distorted by Confucius.  Mohammad also claimed that Kaaba was the original temple of God which was hijacked by Meccans and therefore it belonged to the Muslims.


Hong's growing popularity led to military conflict with the Chinese authorities and after initial successes he declared the foundation of the Heavenly Kingdom in 1851 just like Mohammad started the Islamic rule in Medina.  In 1853, Hong captured Nanjing and made it his capital.  In 1964, however, it was besieged and Hong died possibly because of poisoning.


What we can learn from this is the similarity of the deleterious influence of Christianity on human psychology in places as far removed as Arabia or China, be it the 7th century or the 17th century.  Today's liberals declare that the more you oppress some ideology the more it strengthens.  17th century Chinese did not have such modern inhibitions and this rebellion was effectively crushed after its initial stupendous success.


We can apply the same lessons to Islam even in the 21st century.  FIRST WE NEED TO DISCREDIT IT WITH THE HELP OF THE FACTS AND NOT GLORIFY IT AS A RELIGION OF PEACE.  Second, those who use violence to promote Islam have to be destroyed.


REMINDER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating sharing this post and donating.  Do your bit.

TLAIB SHAH FAISAL FIASCO

Dear Earthlings,


Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar became the first Muslim women to be elected to the US Congress.  They are said to be the brave new face of the Muslim-American woman hereto considered to be meek, submissive and docile by stereotypical western media.  Tlaib bad mouthed Trump on getting elected and threatened to impeach him.  Ilhan out of great love and respect for her faith chose to don the hijab.  Both, however chose to be sworn in on the Quran.


We all know that Muslims are brave and brash and audacious when attacking other people and their values, but fall short miserably when questioning their own blind prejudices.  Ilhan defended the hijab citing the first amendment.  That should ring alarm bells when some jihadi slave uses the blind outdated legal document to justify her Islamic slavery.  Trump could not help bragging that Rashida would not have the same freedom of speech in her native land.


Why should freedom of speech be misused by jihadi apologists?  These are poster girls of a victimhood narrative which makes the Muslim the victim of an Islamophobic world while the reality is quite the opposite.  Naseeruddin Shah, very histrionically, fears for the safety of his children.  Shah however does not want to analyse any Islamic cause for his fear.  He just wants to live in his liberal celebrity world where everyone gets unconditional love even if he is a terrorist.


Shah has no advice for Muslims who practice teen talaq, polygamy, join terrorist groups, refuse any amendments in sharia.  Like a typical jihadi he asserts that 'Yeh mulk mera hai, mujhe is mulk se koi nahi nikal sakta."  Why should Muslims with such obscurantist values not be thrown out of this planet?


The system wants to pretend that giving these delinquents a voice amounts to offering them a vent for their animalistic passions.  The system creates traitors like Jinnah, Shah Faisal who bite back at the very system that nurtured them.  If people already knew that the courts and CBI were fixed, now Shah Faisal proves that the IAS topper is also fixed by the system to advertise its liberality.  Now Faisal has realized that the real bang for the buck is in politics.


Faisal laments the 1000s of deaths in Kashmir at the hands of security forces.  He blames the rise of Hindutva forces and like any typical Muslim omits the Islamic role in the carnage.  If any proof is required that the system is empowering the traitors and inhumans, this is it.  Far from protecting human values, the system in the name of the Palestine or Kashmir struggle is feeding a very dangerous secular victimhood complex amongst Muslims which only adds fuel to their jihadi fire.


REMEMBER:  You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing the post and donating.  Do your bit.