Dear Earthlings,
"Don't blame Islam for the crazy acts of a few lunatics. Why should an entire community be blamed for the actions of a few misguided individuals?" says the moderate Muslim. "My son had justified ISIS terrorism, but I would have reported him to the police if he had told me of his plans," says the moderate father. Oh! No, his father happens to be on the S list himself for being 'radicalized' and so are some of his brothers. They happen to have salafist tendencies. The whole family lives in that area of Strasbourg which contains 10% of those on the S list. If you thought the S list was something serious, forget it, even soccer hooligans could be on the S list. S could stand for secularism. Emperor Macron asked his police to investigate why the attack could not be averted. For starters, why not have a separate list for gangster jihadist profiles?
LAST VIDEO - WHAT SPIRITUAL JIHAD
Except Marine Le Pen, none of the major politicians even thought it worthwhile to highlight the Islamist nature of the attack. The closest that Laurent Nunez came was in his description of Cherif Chekatt as "being consumed by evil." As you can gather from the lame excuses trotted out to deflect criticism in the direction of Islam, the argument revolves around only a minuscule fraction of so-called Muslims being involved in terrorism. It is the motive that is important, and not the number of terrorists. The motive for this heinous crime was Islamic supremacism, as clearly established in the jihadi war cry, "Allah hu Akbar" uttered by jihadists all over the world. To establish Islamic supremacism, the nonMuslims have to be silenced. If people are afraid to criticize Islam, then Islam can masquerade as a religion of peace, as a religion of feminism, as the most pristinely untampered religion.
But, then what are the progressives doing? They are signing multibillion dollar arms contracts with Middle East countries to provide jobs to European citizens. Do a handful of deaths really matter when billions of dollars and jobs are on the stake? If you ask Trump, the death of a Khashoggi is not a big deal if America has to be great again. Suppressing the motive behind the attack implicates the liberals themselves as abettors of Islamic terrorism. Are salafis moderate? Who and what is a moderate? Does a terrorist declare his plans to all and sundry before attacking? If that were to be the sign, then no terror attack would be successful. The person had 27 convictions on his name. Can a person under surveillance have a grenade and a rifle with ammunition at his home? What exactly are those policemen looking for when they are surveilling 20,000 suspects? It is all a humongous bluff. Just give the masses some stories with spin, and then it is business as usual. It is plain economic seduction.
The only problem is that economics of the left and right variety does not offer any solution to Islamic terrorism. To stop Islamic terrorism, you have to study the mind of a terrorist. You have to study all the prejudices that have been inculcated in his mind from a young age by the herd that he belongs to, but that would be a repudiation of all that the West has stood for in the past 300 years of so. It would be the end of the new world order as envisaged by the Euroamerican axis. Why bother? Extend and pretend. If Merkel goes, Kramp-Karrenbauer will take her place. Let us not shake the certitudes that hold the western firmament from crashing down.
Should not we be asking why Muslims get more Islamized in jails? But, of course, it would be foolish to think that Marx, Mao, or Adam Smith could provide the answer. Do these liberals want to think outside of their usual repertoire? The usual trick is for the right and left to start blaming each other. Then the masses line up behind their favorite football teams and they feel overjoyed and empowered to take part in a slanging match which does not come up with any meaningful result in the least. Can there ever be a nationalist solution for a global problem like Islamic terrorism? Is recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel a nationalist or globalist move? There is a complete connivance between the moderate liberal and the moderate Muslim (whatever that means) when it comes to Islamic terrorism. Both are brutally dishonest and betray Homo sapiens when they take positions on this issue.
Nothing bares the trust deficit between the governed and the elected more than the allegations of false flag operation made by the yellow vests. It shows what the masses think of their leaders and their despicable character. Will those who ask for the repatriation of those salafis be derided as Islamophobes or will a few people continue to be regularly sacrificed at the altar of political correctness? You can identify the trajectory of a terrorist long before he commits a crime. Should we wait till he commits one? Is Google coming up with some new AI algorithms to predict 'suspected terrorist' attacks? Or should we rely more on our common sense and less on fashionoble (pun intended) western principles?
REMINDER: You can save the planet by understanding, educating, sharing the post and donating. Do your bit.
No comments:
Post a Comment