Dear Indians,
I waited and waited and waited. Soon after my last post, a conference was announced by India Speaks Daily probably around December 25, titled Kurukshetra Dharmotsav. I was waiting for Madhu Kishwar's video to be posted so I could write something on it, and her last video can be found posted approximately 2 months ago. This Sandeep Deo is one big fartbag. He claims to be the harbinger of a Hindu renaissance through his KGF foundation. Now the point is I have forgotten everything about this conference, and I have no interest in going through the videos again. So I will be commenting only based on my faint memory. So what I remember is that this Deo claims to be creating a force of fighters trained in taekwondo, horse riding, and other such martial arts. He wants Hindus to fight back. Just imagine a mob of at least 1000 jihadis on the rampage. Police men are on the run, and our KGF trainees trained in lathi danda trying to fight them off. He finds it difficult to collect a decent audience for his seminars. He takes so much time to post his videos from his conference; when will this fighting force materialize? He seems to be competing with RSS guys in quackery. Of course, there are a lot of senas giving commando training to Hindus trying to cash in on Hindu fears. One of them is his ex-partner, with a Kalki Sena.
But when Hindu leaders betray their followers like Devdya Fadnavis did in Nagpur, such filmi senas can do nothing. Has there been any conviction for the Nagpur riots? We were told that the new Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita would give justice in 30 days. Is there any limit to nationalist fakery? The BJP govt cannot even counter mob jihad, which is the most basic form of jihad, which was responsible for the partition of India, yet it now claims that with its AI-backed Akaashteer, it will destroy jihadis once and for all.
The next big star of that conference was ex-CBI director Nageshwar Rao alias Nag. Nag is on Twitter, educating Hindus about jihad. So his whole sermon was on shatrubodh. I had specifically requested most of the participants via tweets to talk about how they would handle the then-boiling situation in E. Bengal differently. But none of the participants may have noted my tweet, because I did not find any of them providing even a stray comment on what was happening in Bangladesh. Most of them seemed dead-focused on targeting Modi. In fact, that was the dominant theme of the whole event. So to my great disappointment, Nag's boring lecture did not contain any material that any average person would not find by just surfing the internet. Nor did Nag have any solutions for anything. I would rate him 0/5 if not less. For a person with so much experience to be so unininspiring and blank like any routine college lecturer revealed the total lack of enthusiasm in the whole establishment of which he was once a central figure.
The next supermodel was Ritu Rathore. The only thing I find remarkable about her are her strategically placed goggles and her super red lipstick. She spoke about neoBuddhists, and I will give her 1/5, only because I found her lecture a little more informative as I generally do not follow this Ambedkarite cult.
Silpi Tiwari as usual spoke on his Khalistani topics. Vishal Thakur gave a short speech on his book. A certain lawyer spoke about his great contribution to the Ram janmaboomi agitation. They all seemed like going through their normal activist routines. And of course, the great Kishwar spoke about her latest breakup with Modi and the reasons for the same, nothing else.
And then while I was waiting for the Kishwar video, the new conference was announced. So I decided that I would wait for that and then write my post, and then Pahalgam happened. But back to the conference. An ageing Rita Hegde wants equal rights for Hindus. She must be a spent force like MK Gandhi. This is how a whole group of activists have been created to confuse Hindus. Of course, Kishwar made it clear right from the start that she did not believe in equal rights for Hindus. Then the rising youth activist Pushkar Agnihotri spoke about the RSS and its anti-Hindu history. A small discussion on Northeast followed and a lot of anti-Waqf diatribes. Was there anything remarkable in the conference? Not that I remember, unless you think that super red lipstick and goggles sitting on the bench is something remarkable in this situation. I think I just glimpsed Madhu Kishwar's long hair as I was fast forwarding. Was it real? She sure has really long and dark tresses for a nonagenarian. I did not rewind. Then I remember her doing a catwalk as she said, "Boys, we must discuss something about Hindudesh." Hindudesh seems to be catching on in this circle, and Nag must have said something too inconsequential for me to recollect.
The real action happened after the conference. Nag's tweet popped up on April 24/25 on my twitter timeline, and again he was saying something about Hindudesh. My temper shot up and I fired back asking him to give the blueprint/timetable for Hindudesh. That arrow must have found its mark. He could not resist firing back. Normally, most do not. He tweeted me to produce my own blueprint/timetable or not criticise him needlessly. Well, I think I have only had one exchange with him long back when I had questioned his secularism definition, but that is a vague memory at present. I have been frequently sending him blog post links. So it is unlikely that he does not know my views. But still I was happy that at least there would be some conversation. So I controlled myself and in a series of tweets, I explained in short my Antijihad formula, which I will condense here for anyone who may be interested:
1. RAMBAAN (already discussed in my last post): Recognise that Muhammad and his beliefs are the core of jihad. So jihad will not end until Muhammad is thoroughly debunked. So what is required is legal promotion and protection of blasphemers and apostates to address the core fallacy of Islam, Allah and Quran. Yet what we see is that those who revolt against Islam like Salwan Momika are dying on the sidelines when they should be at the forefront of antijihad. Instead, Trump wants to build his Riveiras by allying with the likes of Al-Sharaa. This Protestant Mafionomics will spell doom for humanity. So many people have died in the name of sar tan se juda in India. Yet justice has been denied. This should be the centerpiece of antijihad. People should be taught that these are the core beliefs of Islam. On the contrary, the mafionomists pretend that these are the fringe groups. This is a big deception sponsored by the mainstream right/left wingers.
2. TRISHUL:
a: Anti-jihad denial law: This is the singlemost important legislative weapon to roll back the jihadi narrative. Those who pretend that Tipu, Aurangzeb, Amir Khurso, Chishti, etc. are not villains will be the prime targets of this law. They should be prosecuted and dismissed from any important public positions.
b: Strict antiburkha legislation. Mercilessly, attack pseudofeminists who pretend that burkha is a free choice. The major thrust of antijihad should be to liberate those females who were enslaved by the diktats of the unholy Quran.
c: Strict action against maulanas and maulvis to protect young kids from jihadi curriculum to nip the harvest of jihad in the bud. Muslim kids must be taught about the ugly deeds in the name of jihad right from a young age.
This is DHARMATECH. AI cannot defeat jihad. All these principles are the core of antijihad DHARMATECH. And nobody is interested in anything remotely close to this. I must have talked about this many times loosely, but here I am putting this in compact form. Of course, you can add many more things.
But I did not want to appear too obsequious, so I challenged Nag to produce a plan better than mine. Then, I waited, one day, another day, third day. No reply. Oh, I should not have been so rude. I should have held my horses. After all, he is a very senior experienced official. Bloody hell, if he really had a plan better than mine, he could have put me in place by producing one. There he goes again on and on talking rubbish and ignoring my world-class plan. Sarkari kutta, he has spent his whole life licking the boots of politicians, and now after retirement, he cannot sit idle. You sw*ne, still want to make extra dough, do you? This is the best specimen you can find of the whole firangi establishment. These rogues like their ex-colonial masters enjoy themselves at the expense of the masses. He is at the forefront of the Hindu diversionary league. I will teach you Shatrubodh, Mr. CBI Director. Look at yourself in the mirror when you wake up in the morning. You are the shameless impostor pretending to be a Hindu activist, and so are your team members.
So we come to the final bout of the day. Tun, Tun, Tun, Tun... (the bell ringing). Come on, Madhu 'Makkhi' Kishwar. It is your turn---the great, indefatigable, evergreen beauty, high on Chyavanpraash, twin sister of Neetu Singh. Should I talk about her libido, first? There are rumours that she had some feelings for some ex-colleague of hers. Then a young Muslim Kashmiri IAS officer alleged that she made passes at him also. Now I did not pay much attention until I recently noticed an evil glint in the corner of her eye. How far have the daughters of Mother India fallen? Makkhi epitomises that fall. She is Nirmala Sitaraman, Mamta Banerjee/Kulkarni, Swara Bhasker, Sonakshi Sinha, Pratibha Advani, Sagarika Ghosh, all rolled into one. Some say her breakup with Modi is because he did not give her a Rajya Sabha seat.
So Makkhi came from a refugee family, poor girl. I do not know whether her family was well-to-do or not. But very soon, she must have learnt that to do well in her career, she had to junk all that baggage, like Mallikarjun Kharge, whose family was butchered by Razakars, but for him it is now a distant memory. So I have not followed what Makkhi did in her youth, but recently the Yasin Malik episode, the girl from Kathua, and her occasional defence of Asaram have raised my suspicions. She seems to be an activist desperate to find a new cause. Hindu desh it is. The only thing is she herself has no idea what Hindu Desh is. For a seasoned activist fighting the last battle of her life, being so clueless is not acceptable. An honourable activist would have chosen retirement. If she had married, and were now instructing her grandkids to read my blog and learn from it, it would still be better than what she is doing today. Under the circumstances, she is no better than other troublesome sanghis. What riles me is that she could possibly have written a fake book defending the accused in the Kathua and Asaram case just to burnish her Hindu credentials. Come on, Makkhi, prove me wrong by coming up with a blueprint/time table for Hindu Desh.
Makkhi had even landed at Avimukteswaranand's office with some E. Bengal refugees to demand Hindu Desh. I fear for our Shankaracharya. Does he know what kind of vamp he is dealing with? Now even he has to produce Hindu Desh or dissociate himself from Makkhi. The last great contribution made to Hindu history by the Shankaracharyas was probably the Vijayanagara empire. After that, I do not know of anything significant. So either they should stick to sanyasa, or if they want to be activist, then they need to uphold some higher standards than others. Avi's recent campaigns on gohatya have seriously dented his credibility. He should remember what exalted position he is holding. My challenge extends even to him. He should either point out my fallacies or produce something more meaningful.
The Pahalgam episode was the final stimulus for this post. It is now time to entertain the serious possibility that our firangi establishment is conducting false flag attacks against Hindus to pull off some of their spectacular stunts, and the simple justification for this paranoia is why do attacks against Hindus go uninvestigated and why are the perpetrators often rewarded? Look at Abu Azmi. If the establishment wants to regain its credibility, it will have to legally prosecute the criminals and not ignore the finger pointing to the jihadi motives.
Let us face it: not only the politicians but also no Hindu activist of any credibility can be found. If you know of anyone, please inform me. Recently, I questioned Rajiv Malhotra on my Twitter timeline as to the criteria by which he selected Omendra Ratnu as an intellectual kshatriya. You can read my last post about my views on the latter despicable character. I am still waiting for an answer so I can judge Rajiv. I have to be incredibly patient to form my views. I pray that Rajiv is not one of them.
So while the whole media is only breathing Pahalgam day in and day out, the only outcome of that incident is that Mauji will now get bragging rights for at least 5-10 years about ghar me ghus ke maara. In no way, does it deter Pakistan, as Pakistan was back into the fray three hours after the cease fire. This only means that next time the establishment will have to try a riskier stunt to win some more elections. Modis hugdiplomacy has been conclusively buried. Jaishankar's occasional outbursts have no practical actions to back them. When Israel was planning joint strikes to neutralize Iran's nuclear program, why was India so silent on doing the same with the Pakistanis?
What happened to POK lenge? If there was any time, it seemed like this was it. Modi panicked and surrendered to Trump. That is the reality. Indian diplomacy could not thwart IMF loan to Pakistan. The OIC was supporting Pakistan as usual. The forces may have performed creditably, and Modi is hiding his incompetence behind that. Holes in airstrips can be repaired in 10 days at the most. Destroyed equipment will be replaced. The other arms of government failed miserably. Modi ceded land to China. Modi ceded land to Bangladesh. Modi ceded land to Waqf. Modi ceded in Pappu citizenship case. Modi is ceding in National Herald case. Modi has ceded in the black money case. Modi is ceding in caste census. Batenge to katenge? If there is any example of the gross betrayal of Hindus in recent times, it is Modi, Modi, Modi. The only rashtrawaadi judgement is that Modi, Bhagwat and Amit Shah should be beaten to pulp in public. Only that will deter these rogues. I was surprised to find that Amit Shah has a new backer in Ritu Rathore. So all this activism is about replacing one thug with another.
I am still saying that after December, turn to Bangladesh. Do a Xinjiang. No chicken neck, the whole thing. Change the global narrative. Hindus and Israelis need to combine intellectually to challenge the Riveira's and two-state solutions imposed by crusader imperialists, who have a nexus with the jihadi imperialists of Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc. Even if Balochistan is separated or Iran is invaded, the crusader imperialist will prefer a jihadi imperialist puppet. So that will not solve the problem. A fundamental change in geopolitics is inevitable if the situation has to improve.
On the other side, we need to proactively blackmail the EU that if they continue to support Pakistan, then we can supply defence equipment like tanks, drones, and other such weapons to Russia. Begin with T-72 tanks for example and ramp it up. But remember that this is not about becoming the next big economy. It is about having the right priorities. Facts and human understanding first.
There are two main classes of shatrus in this country: those who swear by the Quran and those who swear by the constitution. Those who swear by the constitution have not and will never be able to defend the organic values of this civilisation. The BJP-RSS have also joined this club recently.
Sophia Qureshi and Rubika Liyaqat are the modern face of terror. The govt of India theatrically used the sindoor symbolism for their stunt and ultimately failed that test, backing off as usual. Presenting a sindoor-less, anti-sindoor Sophia as the defender of sindoor was a crude attempt at pseudosecular symbolism. If Sophia was a true Muslim, then she should not be moving around without a burkha. And if she is a Muslim, then she is a munafkeen of the highest order. So unless she denounces Allah and his prophet, she should be factually considered a closet jihadi. As for THE Rubika Liyaqat, small statements like 'you cannot blame a whole community' can be a very big obstacle to an honest answer. The facts point out that those who claim to believe in Allah and Muhammad are indeed jihadis who can turn coat anytime like Mohammad Younus did. So will Rubika Liyaqat, when the time suits her. Such weak schemes should have no place in our precise plan. I am waiting for anybody who wants a serious conversation, but do not press on my nerves.
